US 11,854,689 B2
Healthcare performance
Lisa Schaberg, Lee's Summit, MO (US); Don Jacob, Kansas City, KS (US); Nolan Howlett, Kansas City, KS (US); Shannon Robinson, Kansas City, KS (US); Tiffany Bateson, Kansas City, KS (US); and Angela Betts, Kansas City, KS (US)
Assigned to CERNER INNOVATION, INC., Kansas City, MO (US)
Filed by CERNER INNOVATION, INC., Kansas City, KS (US)
Filed on Dec. 29, 2020, as Appl. No. 17/136,817.
Prior Publication US 2022/0208359 A1, Jun. 30, 2022
Int. Cl. G16H 50/20 (2018.01); G16H 10/20 (2018.01); G16H 40/20 (2018.01); G06Q 50/26 (2012.01); G06F 3/04842 (2022.01)
CPC G16H 40/20 (2018.01) [G06Q 50/265 (2013.01); G06F 3/04842 (2013.01)] 20 Claims
OG exemplary drawing
 
1. A method implemented in a computing system including at least a processor, the method comprising:
receiving comprehensive safety measurement scores, including associated metadata, for multiple hospitals from an external safety rating agency for a time period;
analyzing, by the processor, the metadata to identify hospital identifiers for one or more of the multiple hospitals;
analyzing, by the processor, the metadata to determine (i) individual safety measurements that were used to calculate the comprehensive safety measurement score for a selected hospital identifier representing a hospital, and (ii) a weight associated with each individual safety measurement;
in response to receiving, via a graphical user interface, a first user selection to provide the comprehensive safety measurement score for the hospital, automatically causing the graphical user interface to display the comprehensive safety measurement score for the hospital;
in response to receiving, via the graphical user, a second user selection to provide the individual safety measurements for the hospital determined from the metadata, automatically causing the graphical user interface to display each of the individual safety measurements for the hospital for the time period that were used to calculate the comprehensive safety measurement score;
in response to receiving, via the graphical user, a third user selection to change a selected individual safety measurement from the individual safety measurements for the hospital with a proposed changed value:
initiating a modeling module configured to determine an impact of the proposed changed value by at least:
changing a current value of the selected individual safety measurement to the proposed changed value;
applying the weight associated with the selected individual safety measurement to the proposed changed value;
generating a predicted comprehensive safety measurement score that results based on the proposed changed value by recalculating the comprehensive safety measurement score of the selected hospital with the individual safety measurements that were used to calculate the comprehensive safety measurement score and the proposed changed value; and
displaying, on the graphical user interface, the predicted comprehensive safety measurement score to reflect the predicted impact of the proposed changed value.