CPC G01B 9/02061 (2013.01) [G01B 9/02055 (2013.01); G01B 9/02059 (2013.01); G01B 9/02087 (2013.01); G01B 11/2441 (2013.01); G01M 11/005 (2013.01); G01M 11/0271 (2013.01); G01B 9/02039 (2013.01)] | 5 Claims |
1. A method for characterizing the surface shape of an optical surface of an optical element, wherein
the optical element is incorporated as a test object in an interferometric test device such that the surface is arranged completely within a measurement region of the test device,
a plurality of interferometric measurements are carried out on the test object, and
between the measurements a rotational position of the test object relative to the test device is changed by limited rotation of the test object about a test object rotation axis, and wherein
in order to form a first measurement series with first measurements, M first measured values are captured for M rotational positions with a rotation angle difference of 360°/M and in order to form a second measurement series, N second measured values are captured for N rotational positions with a rotation angle difference of 360°/N, where M and N are relatively prime natural numbers, and
in an evaluation operation, measured values are evaluated jointly in order to ascertain shape information for characterizing the surface shape of the optical surface,
wherein the evaluation operation, in an iterative process, comprises:
(A) calculating a first figure based on the first measurements, wherein the first figure is a common concomitantly rotating figure of the first measurement series;
(B) subtracting the first figure from the first measured values in order to determine a first test set-up error containing common non-concomitantly rotating errors of the first measurement series;
(C) using the first test set-up error for calculating a corrected first figure, which results from the first figure by subtraction of the first test set-up error;
(D) subtracting the corrected first figure from the second measured values in order to determine a second test set-up error;
(E) using the second test set-up error for calculating a corrected second figure, which results from the second measured values by taking into account the second test set-up error;
(F) using the corrected second figure for correcting the first test set-up error by subtracting the corrected second figure from the first measured values in order to determine a corrected first test set-up error containing common non-concomitantly rotating errors of the first measurement series and of the second measurement series;
(G) using the corrected first test set-up error for calculating a first figure corrected once again; and
(H) comparing the result with a convergence criterion and optionally repeating steps (A) to (H) depending on a result of the comparison.
|