US 12,242,799 B2
System and method for reviewing and evaluating discrepancies between two or more documents
Barak Edelstein, Toronto (CA); Patrick Allan Heiland, Toronto (CA); Andrew Gordon Storey, Toronto (CA); Yannick Lallement, Toronto (CA); Ajinkya Kulkarni, Toronto (CA); Min Li, Toronto (CA); Tanaby Zibamanzar Mofrad, Toronto (CA); Saif Charaniya, Toronto (CA); Andrew Peter Kujtan, Toronto (CA); Pragnya Addala, Toronto (CA); and Simrandeep Singh, Toronto (CA)
Assigned to The Bank of Nova Scotia, Toronto (CA)
Filed by The Bank of Nova Scotia, Toronto (CA)
Filed on Jun. 16, 2022, as Appl. No. 17/842,377.
Prior Publication US 2023/0409823 A1, Dec. 21, 2023
Int. Cl. G06F 40/194 (2020.01); G06F 40/106 (2020.01); G06F 40/205 (2020.01); G06F 40/284 (2020.01); G06F 40/295 (2020.01)
CPC G06F 40/194 (2020.01) [G06F 40/106 (2020.01); G06F 40/205 (2020.01); G06F 40/284 (2020.01); G06F 40/295 (2020.01)] 19 Claims
OG exemplary drawing
 
1. A method for reviewing documents, the method comprising;
selecting at least one reference document;
selecting a secondary document to compare to the reference document;
conducting an analysis of the static components in secondary document compared to the at least one reference document;
conducting an analysis of the dynamic components of the secondary document compared to the at least one reference document;
presenting contextual differences between said reference document and said secondary document to a user for evaluation for acceptance or rejection; and
storing criteria of the acceptance or rejection as a corresponding rule, in a rule database;
selecting a third document to compare to the at least reference document,
conducting an analysis of the static components in third document compared to the at least one reference document;
conducting an analysis of the dynamic components of the third document compared to the at least one reference document;
identifying contextual differences between said reference document and said third document;
recalling the criteria of the acceptance or rejection in the rule database and comparing the criteria of the acceptance or rejection to the contextual differences between said reference document and said third document and if the criteria of the acceptance or rejection is met, applying the rule corresponding to the criteria to the contextual differences between said reference document and said third document; and;
determining if there are further contextual differences between said reference document and said third document to which no rules apply; and
presenting the remaining further contextual differences between said reference document and said third document to a user for evaluation for acceptance or rejection.